- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Moralization of preferences and conventions and the dynamics of tribal formation
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41 (2018)
Abstract
Stanford casts original light on the question of why humans moralize some preferences. However, his account leaves some ambiguity around the relationship between the evolutionary function of moralization and the dynamics of tribal formation. Does the model govern these dynamics, or only explain why there are moralizing dispositions that more conventional modeling of the dynamics can exploit?Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Where do preferences come from?Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2013 - International Journal of Game Theory 42 (3):613-637.
Preferences and paternalism on freedom and deliberative democracy.Christian F. Rostbøll - 2005 - Political Theory 33 (3):370 - 396.
In defense of adaptive preferences.Donald W. Bruckner - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (3):307 - 324.
From moralization to class society or from class society to moralization: Philosophical comments on Klaus Eder's hypothesis.P. Ruben - 1981 - In Uffe Juul Jensen & Rom Harré (eds.), The Philosophy of Evolution. St. Martin's Press. pp. 120--136.
Tolstoy and the moral instructions of death.Dennis Sansom - 2004 - Philosophy and Literature 28 (2):417-429.
A Reductio Ad Absurdum of Restricted, Tribal Criminal Jurisdiction.Clifton Perry - 2004 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):253-262.
Walking the tightrope: Unrecognized conventions and arbitrariness.Megan Henricks Stotts - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60 (8):867-887.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-05-19
Downloads
23 (#681,424)
6 months
4 (#787,709)
2018-05-19
Downloads
23 (#681,424)
6 months
4 (#787,709)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-wg6s5 uwo