Learning from the Shape of Data

Philosophy of Science 88 (5):1033-1044 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To make sense of large data sets, we often look for patterns in how data points are “shaped” in the space of possible measurement outcomes. The emerging field of topological data analysis offers a toolkit for formalizing the process of identifying such shapes. This article aims to discover why and how the resulting analysis should be understood as reflecting significant features of the systems that generated the data. I argue that a particular feature of TDA—its functoriality—is what enables TDA to translate visual intuitions about structure in data into precise, computationally tractable descriptions of real-world systems.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Size, shape, seeing, and sense-data.John Morreall - 1978 - Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 9 (3):101-112.
Privacy concerns in educational data mining and learning analytics.Isak Potgieter - 2020 - International Review of Information Ethics 28.
Big Data.Wolfgang Pietsch - 2021 - Cambridge University Press.
Radical empiricism and machine learning research.Judea Pearl - 2021 - Journal of Causal Inference 9 (1):78-82.
Robotics, Big Data, Ethics and Data Protection: A Matter of Approach.Nicola Fabiano - 2019 - In Maria Isabel Aldinhas Ferreira, João Silva Sequeira, Gurvinder Singh Virk, Mohammad Osman Tokhi & Endre E. Kadar (eds.), Robotics and Well-Being. Springer Verlag. pp. 79-87.
Data Return: The Sense of the Given in Educational Research.Paul Standish - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 35 (3):497-518.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-03

Downloads
30 (#533,217)

6 months
7 (#430,392)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sarita Rosenstock
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

ML interpretability: Simple isn't easy.Tim Räz - 2024 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 103 (C):159-167.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Semantic View, If Plausible, Is Syntactic.Hans Halvorson - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (3):475-478.
Proofs, pictures, and Euclid.John Mumma - 2010 - Synthese 175 (2):255 - 287.

Add more references