Has Burczak shown how socialism can survive Hayek?

Abstract

Ever since the collapse of Soviet-bloc socialism, and the associated breakup of the Soviet Union itself, it has been accepted by the vast majority of political economists that Friedrich A. Hayek and his fellow Austrians, notably his mentor, Ludwig von Mises, were the unequivocal victors in the famous “socialist calculation debate” that had raged for a good seven decades. It was over. The anti-socialist, Austrian position had won. Market capitalism was triumphant in both theory and practice. The combination of lack of incentives and inevitably dispersed and asymmetric information had doomed command central planning of economies, especially in an increasingly complicated modern world economy (Rosser and Rosser, 2004, Chap. 3).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Is socialism really “impossible”?Bryan Caplan - 2004 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (1):33-52.
Hayek revisited.Mark Blaug - 1993 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 7 (1):51-60.
Schumpeter, Socialism, and Irony.Peter J. Boettke, Solomon M. Stein & Virgil Henry Storr - 2017 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 29 (4):415-446.
Marxism after the collapse of the soviet union.G. A. Cohen - 1999 - The Journal of Ethics 3 (2):99-104.
Dr. Pangloss goes to market.David Schweickart - 1996 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (3):333-352.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
47 (#105,769)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references