Political interviews in public television and commercial broadcasters: A comparison

Discourse and Communication 8 (2):155-179 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article I examine the differences between broadcast political interviews in commercial and public service broadcasters in Spain. The study focuses in particular on political interviews broadcast on ‘morning show’ type programmes. The analysis distinguishes the characteristics that make up the news interview turn-taking system in order to explore the degree to which information and entertainment come together in political interviews broadcast on morning shows. The results show, primarily, that political interviews shown on public service broadcasters’ morning shows adhere to the journalistic standards of neutralism and adversarialness. This is precisely how they strive to make the politician publicly accountable. In political interviews broadcast by commercial broadcasters, however, these rules are followed intermittently. The aim of these interviews appears to be different: to penetrate politicians’ personal sphere with the discernible purpose of entertaining. These differences reflect different interview styles which, in turn, reveal different conceptions of journalism, politics and society. This investigation utilizes the research tools developed in conversation analysis.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gaze work in political media interviews.Mats Ekström - 2012 - Discourse and Communication 6 (3):249-271.
Rituals of personal experience in television news interviews.Martin Montgomery - 2010 - Discourse and Communication 4 (2):185-211.
Delimiting the burden of proof in political interviews.Corina Andone - 2016 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (1):74-87.
Take care of freedom and truth will take care of itself: interviews with Richard Rorty.Richard Rorty - 2006 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Edited by Eduardo Mendieta.
Public broadcasting as a tool to fight with manipulative and destructive informationpsychological influence in Ukraine.V. Konakh - 2016 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 5:49-60.
Political manipulation and public sphere as components of the political communications.A. Tretyak & O. Pilipenko - 2011 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1 (21):156-160.
Corrigendum.[author unknown] - 2017 - Discourse and Communication 11 (5):545-545.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-25

Downloads
3 (#1,710,044)

6 months
2 (#1,192,898)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Question pursuit as an epistemic stance.Hakob Barseghyan - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 94 (C):112-120.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Lectures on Conversation.Harvey Sacks & Gail Jefferson - 1995 - Human Studies 18 (2):327-336.
Forms of Talk.Erving Goffman - 1981 - Human Studies 5 (2):147-157.
Forms of Talk.Erving Goffman - 1981 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 17 (3):181-182.

View all 10 references / Add more references