Heidegger’s Polemos: From Being to Politics [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 56 (2):419-420 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This excellent study of the theme of polemos shows a detailed grasp of the entire range of Heidegger’s writings and relevant parts of the huge and rapidly growing secondary literature. This work is based on recent efforts to understand the link between Heidegger’s philosophical theories and his politics. In Fried’s opinion, efforts by Heidegger or his more uncritical fans to deny his Nazi proclivities are not only fallacious but also obscure his theories. Fried is concerned to grasp Heidegger’s theories within his times and as they relate to our times without reducing one to the other. In following polemos throughout Heidegger’s writings, he casts genuine light on the position as a whole. Fried focuses mainly on the middle period, when Heidegger is explicitly concerned with polemos. He shows that this concept links together Heidegger’s writings, early and late.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Heidegger’s “Polemos”.Gregory Fried - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:159-195.
Heidegger’s “Polemos”.Gregory Fried - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:159-195.
Heidegger's Polemos: From Being to Politics.Charles Gregory Fried - 1994 - Dissertation, The University of Chicago
Heidegger's Polemos: From Being to Politics (review).Robert A. Reeves - 2001 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (3):453-454.
Polemos and Dao: Conflict and Harmony in Heidegger and Zhuangzi.Steven Burik - 2015 - In Aaron Creller (ed.), Conflict and Harmony in Comparative Philosophy.
Heidegger’s Polemos: From Being to Politics. [REVIEW]Seamus Carey - 2001 - International Philosophical Quarterly 41 (4):486-488.
Critical Notices.T. Rockmore - 1999 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (1):89-118.
Appropriating Heidegger.James E. Faulconer & Mark A. Wrathall (eds.) - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-10

Downloads
1 (#1,889,095)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom Rockmore
Duquesne University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references