Constant factors and hedgeless Hedges: On heuristics and biases in biological research

Philosophy of Science 70 (5):975-988 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How does a complex organism develop from a relatively simple, homogeneous mass? The usual answer is: through the (context‐dependent) execution of species‐specific genetic instructions specifying the development of that organism. Commentators are sometimes skeptical of this usual answer, but of course not all commentators, and not always for the same reasons. Here I attempt to lay bare the logical structure of the usual answer through an extended analysis of the heuristics and methodological principles at play in the exploration and explanation of development—and also to show a critical ambiguity that renders the usual answer suspect.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
26 (#145,883)

6 months
6 (#1,472,471)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason Robert
Arizona State University

Citations of this work

The comparative biology of human nature.Jason Scott Robert - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (3):425 – 436.

Add more citations