A framework for analysing definitions of literacy

Educational Studies 31 (1):29-38 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Numerous definitions of literacy have been advanced by policy‐makers, politicians, academics, teachers and others over the years. It is not always easy, however, to know how one definition might relate to another or differ from it. This paper offers a framework, based on the work of the educational philosopher Israel Scheffler, for identifying and distinguishing between different types of definition. Modified to have particular relevance to statements about literacy, the three types of definition are: stipulative, essentialist and prescriptive. The paper shows how this modified framework can be helpful in understanding and addressing apparent tensions in statements about literacy by the influential Brazilian educationist, Paulo Freire. Brief suggestions for further study are included in the author's final remarks

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defining Literacy: Paradise, Nightmare or Red Herring?Peter Roberts - 1995 - British Journal of Educational Studies 43 (4):412 - 432.
Facilitating Reflection Among Family Literacy Participants.Donald J. Yarosz & Susan Willar Fountain - 2003 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 23 (1-2):39-43.
Cavell, literacy and what it means to read.Amanda J. Fulford - 2009 - Ethics and Education 4 (1):43-55.
A Critical Discussion of the 'New Literacy Studies'.Kate Stephens - 2000 - British Journal of Educational Studies 48 (1):10 - 23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-20

Downloads
23 (#682,859)

6 months
6 (#522,028)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references