Peirce and Lonergan on Inquiry and the Pragmatics of Inference

International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (2):181-194 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Drawing on the work of Charles Peirce and Bernard Lonergan, I argue (1) that inferences are essentially related to a process of inquiry, (2) that there is a normative pattern to this process, one in which each of Peirce’s three distinct types of inference—abductive, deductive, and inductive—plays a distinct cognitive role, and (3) that each type of inference answers a distinct type of question and thereby resolves a distinct kind of interrogative intentionality

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Four Problems of Abduction: A Brief History.Anya Plutynski - 2011 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (2):227-248.
Abductive Inference, Design Science, and Dewey's Theory of Inquiry.Jaime J. Marcio - 2001 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 37 (1):97 - 121.
Ampliative abduction.James Blachowicz - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (2):141 – 157.
A neurocomputational approach to abduction.Robert G. Burton - 1999 - Minds and Machines 9 (2):257-265.
Peirce for linguistic pragmaticists.Daniel Hugo Rellstab - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (2):pp. 312-345.
Aspects of Peirce's Theory of Inference.L. J. O'Neill - 1998 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34 (2):436 - 449.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
33 (#483,256)

6 months
5 (#632,816)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alan Rhoda
Christian Theological Seminary

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references