The Philosophical Defence of Psychiatry

New York: Routledge (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

By first analysing the arguments of psychiatry's critics and the philosophical ideas of such thinkers as Freud, Eysenck, Laing, Szasz, Sedgwick and Foucault and by then providing answers to the many contentious and diverse questions raised, Dr. Reznek aims to establish a philosophical defence of the theory and practice of psychiatry. As both a qualified philosopher and psychiatrist, the author is exceptionally p[laced to undertake the examination of a subject which has hitherto remained untackled. It will be easily accessible to a wide variety of non-specialists as well. It will be of specific interest to those involved in the practice of philosophy, psychiatry, clinical psychology, social work and psychiatric nursing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-08

Downloads
5 (#1,560,632)

6 months
2 (#1,446,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Feminism, Underdetermination, and Values in Science.Kristen Intemann - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1001-1012.
Illness as unhomelike being-in-the-world? Phenomenology and medical practice.Rolf Ahlzén - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (3):323-331.
What Is Mental Illness?Eisuke Sakakibara - 2017 - Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 44 (1-2):55-75.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references