The patient's duty to adhere to prescribed treatment: An ethical analysis

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):167 – 188 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines the ethical basis for the patient's duty to adhere to the physician's treatment prescriptions. The article argues that patients have a moral duty to adhere to the physician's treatment prescriptions, once they have accepted treatment. Since patients still retain the right to refuse medical treatment, their duty to adhere to treatment prescriptions is a prima facie duty, which can be overridden by their other ethical duties. However, patients do not have the right to refuse to adhere to treatment prescriptions if their non-adherence poses a significant threat to other people. This paper also discusses the use of written agreements between physicians and patients as a strategy for promoting patient adherence.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Treatment Adherence in the Absence of Insight: A Puzzle and a Proposed Solution.Marga Reimer - 2010 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (1):65-75.
Prisoner's right to refuse treatment outweighs physician's duty to treat.G. P. Drescher - 1992 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 21 (3-4):400-401.
The Catalogue of Patients' Duties in Lithuania: The Legal Analysis of Contents.Indrė Špokienė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (4):1529-1550.
The right to refuse treatment is not a right to be killed.S. L. Lowe - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (3):154-163.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
57 (#273,573)

6 months
7 (#592,867)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references