Review of Metaphysics 55 (4):751 - 784 (2002)
AbstractEVER SINCE PLOTINUS SOUGHT CLARITY in the notion of privation to dispel our human perplexity about evil, philosophers have debated whether this concept is adequate to the task. The intensity and scope of evil in the twentieth century—which has seen the horrors of world war and genocide—have added fuel to the debate. Can the idea of a falling away from the good, however refined, come anywhere close to capturing the calculation, the commitment, the energy, and the drive that underlie the most virulent projects in malfeasance? While the privation account might appear a reasonable strategy for explaining passive wrongdoing—indifference to people in grave need, or cooperation with injustice—the more active and dynamic forms of evil would nevertheless seem to elude its conceptual net.
Similar books and articles
Is All Evil Really Only Privation?John F. Crosby - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:197-209.
Privation Theories of Pain.Adam Swenson - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (3):139 - 154.
The De Malo of Thomas Aquinas: With Facing-Page Translation by Richard Regan.Saint Thomas, van Aquino Thomas, Thomas Aquinas & Richard J. Regan - 2001 - Oxford University Press, Usa.
Thomas Aquinas Between Just War and Pacifism.Gregory M. Reichberg - 2010 - Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (2):219-241.
The De Malo of Thomas Aquinas.Thomas Hibbs - 2002 - International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (4):562-563.
Evil and Privation.G. Stanley Kane - 1980 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (1):43 - 58.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Reality and the Meaning of Evil: On the Moral Causality of Signs.Kirk G. Kanzelberger - 2020 - Reality 1 (1):146-204.
References found in this work
No references found.