World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time. John Earman [Book Review]

Philosophy of Science 59 (4):718-722 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/289714

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review of John Earman: World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute Versus Relational Theories of Space and Time. [REVIEW]Anna Maidens - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1):129-136.
Review of John Earman: World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute Versus Relational Theories of Space and Time. [REVIEW]Carl Hoefer - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (4):573-580.
John Earman, World Enough and Space-time: Absolute vs. relational theories of space and time Reviewed by.Carl Hoefer - 1991 - Philosophy in Review 11 (3):178-181.
John Earman. World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time. Cambridge, Mass, and London: MIT Press, 1990. Pp. xiv + 223. ISBN 0-262-05040-4. £22.50. [REVIEW]Jeremy Gray - 1991 - British Journal for the History of Science 24 (4):497-497.
World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time.John S. Earman - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1):129-136.
World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time.John S. Earman - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (4):573-580.
World Enough and Space ‐ Time: Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time.David Knight - 1991 - Philosophical Books 32 (3):188-188.
World enough and space‐time: Absolute versus relational theories of space and time.Robert Toretti & John Earman - 1989 - Philosophical Review 101 (3):723.
Review essays: Absolute vs. relational theories of space and time: A review of John Earman's world enough and space-time. [REVIEW]Review author[S.]: Robert Rynasiewicz - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (3):675-687.
Book Review:Foundations of Space-Time Theories (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 8) John S. Earman, Clark N. Glymour, John J. Stachel. [REVIEW]Philip L. Quinn - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (2):327-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
96 (#183,933)

6 months
3 (#1,046,148)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Redhead
Last affiliation: London School of Economics

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What price spacetime substantivalism? The hole story.John Earman & John Norton - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):515-525.
The hole truth.Jeremy Butterfield - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (1):1-28.
Relativity and Geometry.R. Torretti - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (1):100-104.
The Shape of Space.Graham Nerlich - 1982 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 172 (1):117-126.

Add more references