The theory of motion according to Newton, Leibniz, and huygens

In M. Reichenbach (ed.), Modern Philosophy of Science. Routledge and Kegan Paul (1959) (1924)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-04-09

Downloads
1 (#1,880,854)

6 months
1 (#1,520,257)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Inference to the Best explanation.Peter Lipton - 2004 - In Martin Curd & Stathis Psillos (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. Routledge. pp. 193.
Geometry and motion.Gordon Belot - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):561--95.
Why manifold substantivalism is probably not a consequence of classical mechanics.Nick Huggett - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):17 – 34.
Inercialita v kontextu Leibnizovy korespondence s Clarkem.Kateřina Lochmanová - 2020 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 42 (2):201-229.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references