Are Marketers Egoists? A Typological Explication

Journal of Business Ethics 155 (2):611-621 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explicate the idea of egoism in the context of marketing. The idea of egoism is reviewed and contextualized into a framework for interpreting different marketer types. Marketers’ potential trade-offs with consumers and competitors are examined. Four types of marketers are explicated: extremely egoistic marketer, moderately egoistic marketer, moderately altruistic marketer, and extremely altruistic marketer. The framework offered in the paper is of relevance to marketers, media, and agencies rewarding marketing performance. The framework may help in assessing the ethical quotient in marketers’ preferences and behaviors. Studies recognizing the pertinence of egoism in marketing are scarce, and the typological framework discussed in the paper is a contribution to the marketing ethics literature.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is wrong with typological thinking?Tim Lewens - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (3):355-371.
Ancestor of the new archetypal biology: Goethe’s dynamic typology as a model for contemporary evolutionary developmental biology.Mark F. Riegner - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4b):735-744.
La explicación del concepto de reducción.Andoni Ibarra & Thomas Mormann - 1988 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 4 (1):139-161.
An explication of 'explication'.Joseph F. Hanna - 1968 - Philosophy of Science 35 (1):28-44.
Explication.Moritz Cordes, and & Geo Siegwart - 2018 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Explication Defended.Patrick Maher - 2007 - Studia Logica 86 (2):331-341.
On the origin of the typological/population distinction in Ernst Mayr's changing views of species, 1942-1959.Carl Chung - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (2):277-296.
Kant’s Explication and Carnap’s Explication.Giovanni Boniolo - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (3):289-298.
The constituents of an explication.Moritz Cordes - 2020 - Synthese 197 (3):983-1010.
Kant’s Explication and Carnap’s Explication.Giovanni Boniolo - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (3):289-298.
An explication of emergence.Elanor Taylor - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (3):653-669.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-05

Downloads
16 (#905,800)

6 months
5 (#637,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Biswanath Swain
Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

References found in this work

Ethics.William Frankena - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (1):74-74.
Corporations and Morality.Thomas Donaldson - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (3):251-253.
Two Treatises of Government.Roland Hall - 1966 - Philosophical Quarterly 16 (65):365.
Business Ethics and Extant Social Contracts.Thomas W. Dunfee - 1991 - Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (1):23-51.

View all 40 references / Add more references