The Electrodynamic 2-Body Problem and the Origin of Quantum Mechanics

Foundations of Physics 34 (6):937-962 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We numerically solve the functional differential equations (FDEs) of 2-particle electrodynamics, using the full electrodynamic force obtained from the retarded Lienard–Wiechert potentials and the Lorentz force law. In contrast, the usual formulation uses only the Coulomb force (scalar potential), reducing the electrodynamic 2-body problem to a system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). The ODE formulation is mathematically suspect since FDEs and ODEs are known to be incompatible; however, the Coulomb approximation to the full electrodynamic force has been believed to be adequate for physics. We can now test this long-standing belief by comparing the FDE solution with the ODE solution, in the historically interesting case of the classical hydrogen atom. The solutions differ. A key qualitative difference is that the full force involves a ‘delay’ torque. Our existing code is inadequate to calculate the detailed interaction of the delay torque with radiative damping. However, a symbolic calculation provides conditions under which the delay torque approximately balances (3rd order) radiative damping. Thus, further investigations are required, and it was prematurely concluded that radiative damping makes the classical hydrogen atom unstable. Solutions of FDEs naturally exhibit an infinite spectrum of discrete frequencies. The conclusion is that (a) the Coulomb force is not a valid approximation to the full electrodynamic force, so that (b) the n-body interaction needs to be reformulated in various current contexts such as molecular dynamics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On classical and quantum relativistic dynamics.F. Reuse - 1979 - Foundations of Physics 9 (11-12):865-882.
How to interpret quantum mechanics.Jeffrey Bub - 1994 - Erkenntnis 41 (2):253 - 273.
Why the difference between quantum and classical mechanics is irrelevant to the mind-body problem.Kirk A. Ludwig - 1995 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 2.
From Micro to Macro: A Solution to the Measurement Problem of Quantum Mechanics.Jeffrey Bub - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:134 - 144.
Why did the new physics force out the old?Rinat M. Nugayev - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (2):127 – 140.
Quantum Potential in Relativistic Dynamics.John R. Fanchi - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (8):1161-1189.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
46 (#330,292)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Time Travel and the Reality of Spontaneity.C. K. Raju - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 36 (7):1099-1113.
Role of a Time Delay in the Gravitational Two-Body Problem.E. Oks - 2021 - Foundations of Physics 51 (1):1-17.
Time: What is it That it can be Measured?C. K. Raju - 2006 - Science & Education 15 (6):537-551.
Does Bohm’s Quantum Force Have a Classical Origin?David C. Lush - 2016 - Foundations of Physics 46 (8):1006-1021.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references