Freedom, Socialism, and Property‐Owning Democracy

Journal of Applied Philosophy 39 (4):664-681 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What should a free economic system look like? Socialists have long held that a universal human emancipation requires replacing capitalism with socialism. However, it has recently been argued that Property‐Owning Democracy (POD) safeguards freedom while allowing us to keep key features of capitalism. I challenge that claim by showing that the institutional features that make capitalist workplaces unfree are shared with POD. As a result, POD is insufficient for a free economic system. After discussing a number of objections, I conclude that we should look to more democratic alternatives instead.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Property Owning Democracy or a Liberal (Democratic) Socialism?Wonsup Jung - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 41:132-139.
The Demands of Democratic Ownership.Alan Thomas - 2017 - Analyse & Kritik 39 (2):413-416.
Property-owning democracy as an alternative to capitalism.Paul Raekstad - 2017 - European Journal of Political Theory 19 (4):614-622.
Socialist Republicanism.Tom O’Shea - 2020 - Political Theory 48 (5):548-572.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-20

Downloads
30 (#532,397)

6 months
6 (#518,648)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Data-owning democracy or digital socialism?James Muldoon - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references