- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Je paradox holiče paradoxem?
Pro-Fil 12 (2):3 (2012)
Abstract
V první části textu ukazuji, že paradox holiče není analogický Russellově paradoxu, ba že to vůbec není paradox. Poté se stručně věnuji otázce jeho pravděpodobného historického původu i původu jeho známých verzí. V závěru diskutuji zdroj jeho údajné paradoxnosti.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Sedm důvodů pro nemožnost vytvoření univerzální definice života.Vladimír Vodička - 2014 - Pro-Fil 2014 (S1):89-108.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-11-26
Downloads
10 (#1,207,918)
6 months
8 (#505,181)
2020-11-26
Downloads
10 (#1,207,918)
6 months
8 (#505,181)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
The semantic paradoxes: A diagnostic investigation.Charles Chihara - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (4):590-618.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-ktvwr uwo