Rules and conventions for metascience reviewers

[author unknown]
Metascience 6 (2):3-3 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf03022135

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The 'Reviewers Reviewed': Science in the Nineteenth-Century Periodical. [REVIEW]Jim Mussell - 2005 - Metascience 14 (3):363-370.
Metascience builds connections.K. Brad Wray & Lori Nash - 2023 - Metascience 32 (1):1-2.
Instructions for Authors - Metascience.[author unknown] - 2004 - Metascience 12 (1):149-152.
History of biology repackaged for philosophers of biology. [REVIEW]Daniel J. Nicholson - 2024 - Metascience 33 (1):73-76.
On the edges of science.Stéphanie Debray - forthcoming - Metascience:1-4.
Notices.[author unknown] - 1997 - Metascience 6 (2):172-173.
Reviews. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2004 - Metascience 13 (3):275-422.
Notices.[author unknown] - 1997 - Metascience 6 (1):185-190.
A new grammar of science.Michał Oleksowicz - 2023 - Metascience 32 (1):15-18.
Being part of science. [REVIEW]Jonathan Simon - 2023 - Metascience 32 (3):333-336.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
1 (#1,722,932)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references