Some Epistemic Implications of 'Crucial Experiments'

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 5 (1):49 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Role of Crucial Experiments in Science.Imre Lakatos - 1974 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 4 (4):309.
Reply to Philip L. Quinn.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1997 - In Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm. Chicago: Open Court.
Philip L. Quinn (1940-2004).Eugene Thomas Long - 2005 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 (1):75 -.
Knowing what would happen: The epistemic strategies in Galileo's thought experiments.Kristian Camilleri - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:102-112.
Tribute to Philip L. Quinn.William J. Wainwright - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (1):120-120.
Obituary: Philip L. Quinn (1940–2004). [REVIEW]Eugene Thomas Long - 2005 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 (1):75-75.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
5 (#847,061)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Changes in the Problem of Inductive Logic.Imre Lakatos - 1968 - In The problem of inductive logic. Amsterdam,: North Holland Pub. Co.. pp. 315--417.
The Role of Crucial Experiments in Science.Imre Lakatos - 1974 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 4 (4):309.

Add more references