Naturalizing the normative and the bridges between 'is' and 'ought"

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):266 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Elqayam & Evans suggest descriptivism as a way to avoid fallacies and research biases. We argue, first, that descriptive and prescriptive theories might be better off with a closer interaction between and Moreover, while we acknowledge the problematic nature of the discussed fallacies and biases, important aspects of research would be lost through a broad application of descriptivism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Naturalizing phenomenology? Dretske on qualia.Ronald McIntyre - 1999 - In Jean Petitot, Francisco Varela, Bernard Pachoud & Jean-Michel Roy (eds.), Naturalizing Phenomenology: Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Stanford University Press. pp. 429--439.
Bridges (from page 16).Tom Bridges - 1991 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (3):22-22.
Pitfalls and Bridges: Challenges in Teaching Business Ethics.Søren Wenstøp, Lars Jacob Tynes Pedersen & Dominic Käslin - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:551-556.
Bridges and the Hopkins MSS: 1889–1930.William A. Dumbleton - 1972 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 47 (3):428-446.
Reply to Bridges.Niko Kolodny - 2009 - Mind 118 (470):369-376.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-04

Downloads
68 (#236,155)

6 months
21 (#122,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katinka Quintelier
University of Ghent

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations