Linsky Leonard. Some notes on Carnap's concept of inlensional isomorphism and the paradox of analysis. Philosophy of science, vol. 16 , pp. 343–347.Carnap Rudolf. A reply to Leonard Linsky. Philosophy of science, vol. 16 , pp. 347–350 [Book Review]

Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):149-150 (1950)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A reply to Leonard Linsky.Rudolf Carnap - 1949 - Philosophy of Science 16 (4):347-350.
A note on Carnap's “Truth and confirmation”.Leonard Linsky - 1950 - Philosophical Studies 1 (6):81-82.
Reference and modality.Leonard Linsky - 1971 - London,: Oxford University Press.
Rejoinder to Linsky.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Philosophical Studies 1 (6):83 -.
Rudolf Carnap's analysis of `truth': Reply.Rudolf Carnap - 1948 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (2):300-304.
Notes.Leonard Linsky - 1972 - Metaphilosophy 3 (4):326–326.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
31 (#511,400)

6 months
6 (#508,473)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references