In Defence of Critical Thinking as a Subject: if McPeck is wrong he is wrong

Journal of Philosophy of Education 28 (1):101-111 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper attempts three things. It invites you to engage critically with me in the adjudication of a particular controversy. It attempts to argue for and exemplify important procedures which distinguish good and bad thinking in a critical mode. And it argues the case for the separate teaching of critical thinking (henceforth CT).

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9752.1994.tb00316.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

In defence of critical thinking as a subject: If McPeck is wrong he is wrong.Victor Quinn - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 28 (1):101–111.
Thinking Critically About Critical Thinking: an unskilled inquiry into Quinn and McPeck.Peter Gardner & Steve Johnson - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 30 (3):441-456.
Thinking critically about critical thinking: An unskilled inquiry into Quinn and McPeck.Peter Gardner & Steve Johnson - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 30 (3):441–456.
Critical Thinking, A Deflated Defense: A Critical Study of John E. McPeck's Teaching Critical Thinking: Dialogue and Dialectic.Jonathan E. Adler - 1991 - Informal Logic 13 (2).
Teaching critical thinking: dialogue and dialectic.John E. McPeck - 1990 - New York: Routledge.
Reflections on Critical Thinking: Theory, Practice, and Assessment.Donald L. Hatcher - 2013 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 28 (2):4-24.
Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking, and Education.Harvey Siegel - 1990 - Routledge.
Critical thinking and the disciplines reconsidered.Martin Davies - 2013 - Higher Education Research and Development 32 (4):529-544.
In Defence of (Over)Thinking.SuddhaSatwa GuhaRoy - 2024 - Think 23 (67):21-26.
An "infusion" approach to critical thinking: Moore on the critical thinking debate.Martin Davies - 2006 - Higher Education Research and Development 25 (2):179-193.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-23

Downloads
6 (#1,485,580)

6 months
2 (#1,259,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

An "infusion" approach to critical thinking: Moore on the critical thinking debate.Martin Davies - 2006 - Higher Education Research and Development 25 (2):179-193.
Critical thinking and the disciplines reconsidered.Martin Davies - 2013 - Higher Education Research and Development 32 (4):529-544.
Learning and the social nature of mental powers.Andrew Davis - 2005 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 37 (5):635–647.
Teaching thinking, and the sanctity of content.Michael Bonnett - 1995 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 29 (3):295–309.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references