Deciphering the appropriateness of defaults: the need for domain-specific evidence

Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (12):721-722 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this issue of The Journal of Medical Ethics, xxx and colleagues report a randomized trial of the influence of default options on delivery room management of an extremely premature infant. They report that among respondents to the hypothetical vignette, those who received the resuscitation default were significantly more likely to choose resuscitation compared with those who were told that the default was comfort care. While the results warrant attention and further investigation, several methodological shortcomings limit the conclusions that can be drawn from this study

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and the Presumption of Informed Consent.David J. Buckles - 2020 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 20 (4):683-693.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-24

Downloads
27 (#578,242)

6 months
3 (#1,208,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The construction of preference.Sarah Lichtenstein & Paul Slovic (eds.) - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Add more references