Revealing Social Functions through Pragmatic Genealogies

In Rebekka Hufendiek, Daniel James & Raphael van Riel (eds.), Social Functions in Philosophy: Metaphysical, Normative, and Methodological Perspectives. New York: Routledge. pp. 200-218 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is an under-appreciated tradition of genealogical explanation that is centrally concerned with social functions. I shall refer to it as the tradition of pragmatic genealogy. It runs from David Hume (T, 3.2.2) and the early Friedrich Nietzsche (TL) through E. J. Craig (1990, 1993) to Bernard Williams (2002) and Miranda Fricker (2007). These pragmatic genealogists start out with a description of an avowedly fictional “state of nature” and end up ascribing social functions to particular building blocks of our practices – such as the fact that we use a certain concept, or live by a certain virtue – which we did not necessarily expect to have such a function at all. That the seemingly archaic device of a fictional state-of-nature story should be a helpful way to get at the functions of our actual practices must seem a mystifying proposal, however; I shall therefore endeavor to demystify it in what follows. My aim in this chapter is twofold. First, by delineating the framework of pragmatic genealogy and contrasting it with superficially similar methods, I argue that pragmatic genealogies are best interpreted as dynamic models whose point is to reveal the function – and non-coincidentally often the social function – of certain practices. Second, by buttressing this framework with something it notably lacks, namely an account of the type of functionality it operates with, I argue that both the type of functional commitment and the depth of factual obligation incurred by a pragmatic genealogy depend on what we use the method for: the dynamic models of pragmatic genealogy can be used merely as heuristic devices helping us spot functional patterns, or more ambitiously as arguments grounding our ascriptions of functionality to actual practices, or even more ambitiously as bases for functional explanations of the resilience or the persistence of practices. By bringing these distinctions into view, we gain the ability to distinguish strengths and weaknesses of the method’s application from strengths and weaknesses of the method itself.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nietzsches affirmative Genealogien.Matthieu Queloz - 2019 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 67 (3):429-439.
History as Philosophy? Genealogies and Critique.Andrius Gališanka - 2015 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 9 (3):444-464.
The Uncanny Effect of Telling Genealogies.Torsten Menge - 2017 - Southwest Philosophy Review 33 (1):63-73.
Pragmatic Functions of Presupposition in Advertising English.Liping Ge - 2011 - Asian Culture and History 3 (1):p153.
Discourse Functions Of Word Order Changes In English Declarative Sentences.Biljana Ilic - 1998 - Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 1 (5):301-313.
Genealogies of Ethics.Zed Adams - 2012 - Analyse & Kritik 34 (1):157-165.
Pragmatic Social Justice: A Conceptual Framework for Practitioners.Eric Hogan - 2017 - Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism, Issue Vol 25 No. 1 25 (1):43-52.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-07

Downloads
1,750 (#5,080)

6 months
285 (#6,544)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthieu Queloz
University of Bern

Citations of this work

The Points of Concepts: Their Types, Tensions, and Connections.Matthieu Queloz - 2019 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (8):1122-1145.
Nietzsche’s English Genealogy of Truthfulness.Matthieu Queloz - 2021 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 103 (2):341-363.
On the Self‐Undermining Functionality Critique of Morality.Matthieu Queloz - 2023 - European Journal of Philosophy 31 (2):501-508.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences: Analyzing Controversies in Social Research.Raimo Tuomela - 1996 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):1086-1090.
A Mark of the Mental: In Defense of Informational Teleosemantics.Gary Ostertag - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (3):628-631.
Language: A Biological Model.John Collins - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (226):142-145.
The invisible hand and the cunning of reason.Ullmann-Margalit Edna - 1997 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 58:429-454.

Add more references