- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The role of metaphor in scientific epistemology: A constructivist perspective and consequences for science education
Science & Education 11 (5):443-457 (2002)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Physics develops unaffected by constructivism.Helmut Schwegler - 2001 - Foundations of Science 6 (4):241-253.
The Issue of Reductionism. A Radical Constructivist Approach to the Philosophy of Physics.A. Quale - 2008 - Constructivist Foundations 4 (1):43-49.
The radical constructivist view of science.Ernst von Glasersfeld - 2001 - Foundations of Science 6 (1-3):31-43.
Some remarks on scientific positivism and constructivist epistemology in science.Ashok K. Vijh - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1):5-8.
Should the Role of Epistemology in Studying Scientific Knowledge be Rethought?Mamchur Elena - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 43:117-120.
Breaking the law: Promoting domain-specificity in chemical education in the context of arguing about the periodic law. [REVIEW]Sibel Erduran - 2007 - Foundations of Chemistry 9 (3):247-263.
Social constructivism and the aims of science.Kareem Khalifa - 2010 - Social Epistemology 24 (1):45 – 61.
Reconstructing undergraduate education: using learning science to design effective courses.Robert B. Innes - 2004 - Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Consequences of Rejecting Constructivism: “Hold Tight and Pedal Fast”. Commentary on Slezak's “Radical Constructivism: Epistemology, Education and Dynamite”.L. P. Steffe - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):112-119.
Fear of Scandalous Knowledge: Arguing About Coherence in Scientific Theory and Practice.Emily A. Schultz - unknown
The methodological significance of scientific metaphor.Guichun Guo - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):437-453.
Between Realism and Constructivism? Luhmann's Ambivalent Epistemological Standpoint.A. Scholl - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):5-12.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-21
Downloads
15 (#940,347)
6 months
4 (#779,041)
2014-03-21
Downloads
15 (#940,347)
6 months
4 (#779,041)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Organisms ≠ Machines.Daniel J. Nicholson - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):669-678.
References found in this work
Radical constructivism: a way of knowing and learning.Ernst von Glasersfeld - 1995 - Washington, D.C.: Falmer Press.
Constructivism in science and science education: a philosophical critique.Robert Nola - 1997 - Science & Education 6 (1-2):55-83.
Epistemological anarchy and the many forms of constructivism.David R. Geelan - 1997 - Science & Education 6 (1-2):15-28.
Constructivist metaphors of learning science.Jon Ogborn - 1997 - Science & Education 6 (1-2):121-133.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-55b469568f-bl6rh uwo