Margolis Looks at the Arts

Metaphilosophy 52 (1):60-74 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the early aesthetic writings of Joseph Margolis from the late 1950s to the mid‐1960s in order to argue for the relevance of these works in understanding Margolis’s later, more well‐known views in the philosophy of art. Specifically, the paper addresses Margolis’s early essays on the definition and ontology of art and aesthetic perception. These essays not only show Margolis engaged in the most significant debates in mid‐century analytic aesthetics but also provide important indications of the limitations of that approach to thinking about the arts that informs the development of Margolis’s later cultural realism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why Margolis Hasn’t Defeated the Entailment Thesis.D. S. Mannison - 1976 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):553-559.
"Philosophy, Looks at the Arts": Joseph Margolis. [REVIEW]Harold Osborne - 1963 - British Journal of Aesthetics 3 (3):284.
Numerical identity and reference in the arts.Joseph Margolis - 1970 - British Journal of Aesthetics 10 (2):138-146.
The Radical Nature of Margolis’ Relativism.B. Richard Beatch - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:81-93.
The Radical Nature of Margolis’ Relativism.B. Richard Beatch - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:81-93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-07

Downloads
12 (#1,078,270)

6 months
2 (#1,192,610)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Russell Pryba
Northern Arizona University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The role of theory in aesthetics.Morris Weitz - 1956 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 15 (1):27-35.
The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude.George Dickie - 1964 - American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (1):56-65.
Defining Art.George Dickie - 1969 - American Philosophical Quarterly 6 (3):253 - 256.
What, After All, Is a Work of Art?Joseph Margolis - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (202):136-138.

View all 11 references / Add more references