Abstract

Contemporary philosophy conceptualized its reflexive artefacts on semiotic field of cultural-ontological bifurcation made by Modern/Postmodern paradigm contradiction, in particular ― by post-structuralism. For authentic understanding of semiotic heterogeneity made by metaphysical «joint» between communicationism and deconstructionism, the adequate reflexive resourses are necessary. The latter make possible comprehend polysemic, antinomic, ambivalent substantive artefacts of thought. In recent decades native philosophers actively rejected discourse practices which comprehend semiotic spaces by means of non-Euclidean reflexivity interpretative resourses. The constitutive productivity of these resourses is especially proved out when they are applied in respect of the research of substantively heterogeneous cultural phenomena to which, without a shred of a doubt, both communicationism and deconstructionism are related to. If one uses the creative potential of the «transcontextual» intercultural discourse, the analysis of semantically multivalued content of such-like phenomena «placed» in «non-Euclidean» reflection sense field is most perspective. It is a comparative analysis of constitutive possibilities contained in the interpretative resourses of transcendental pragmatics and deconstructionism that is carrying out in the proposed paper.