What Is The Basis of Moral Obligation?

In Jim MacAdam (ed.), Moral Writings. Clarendon Press (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To the question ‘What is the basis of moral obligation?’, argues that there is no general answer. It is improper to imply that all right acts are right for the same reason. Before defending this view, considers two possible grounds for moral obligation: 1) the goodness of the effects of an action, and 2) the goodness of the act itself. Whereas the former, which is broadly utilitarian, fails to comply with our real moral convictions, the latter does not capture well the role that motive plays in determining the rightness of an action. Moral principles are not deducible either from one single principle or from anything that is not a principle. Each is independent and possesses its own reason as the basis for a given moral obligation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,377

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral Writings.H. A. Prichard and Jim MacAdam - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press UK. Edited by Jim MacAdam.
Moral writings.H. A. Prichard - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Jim MacAdam.
Biodiversity and all that jazz.Alan Carter - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (1):58-75.
Moral Writings.Jim MacAdam (ed.) - 2002 - Oxford, GB: Clarendon Press.
Military service and moral obligation.Hugo Adam Bedau - 1971 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 14 (1-4):244 – 266.
Some Features of Promises and their Obligations.Michael G. Pratt - 2014 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (3):382-402.
Moral obligation: Form and substance.Stephen Darwall - 2010 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (1pt1):31-46.
El intuicionismo de Prichard.Mauricio Rengifo Gardeazábal - 2005 - Ideas Y Valores 54 (127):35-53.
The Concept of Moral Obligation.Michael J. Zimmerman - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
When can one requirement override another?Alex Rajczi - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 108 (3):309 - 326.
Practical reason and the status of moral obligation.Robert Audi - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (5):pp. 197-229.
The Obligation to Obey the Law.Adejare Oyetunde Oladosu - 1989 - Dissertation, Washington University

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-05

Downloads
81 (#177,367)

6 months
12 (#104,004)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Subjective Rightness and Minimizing Expected Objective Wrongness.Kristian Olsen - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (3):417-441.
Acting for reasons: Reply to Dancy. [REVIEW]John Hyman - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):358-368.
Avoidable Harm.Peter A. Graham - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 (1):175-199.
Acting in ignorance.Jonathan Dancy - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):345-357.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references