- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Epistemic Relativism, Epistemic Incommensurability, and Wittgensteinian Epistemology
In Steven D. Hales (ed.), A Companion to Relativism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 266–285 (2010)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Abstract From the Epistemology of Disagreement to Epistemic Relativism The Irrelevance of Epistemic Externalism Wittgensteinian Epistemology and Epistemic Relativism Williams's Wittgensteinian Contextualism Wittgensteinian Epistemology Reconsidered Concluding Remarks References.Author's Profile
epistemic relativism, epistemic incommensurability and Wittgensteinian epistemology from epistemology of disagreement ‐ to epistemic relativism specifically epistemic form of relativism Wittgenstein's writings on epistemology epistemology of disagreement ‐ disputes of the sort that concern us Adam's adversary, “Eve” ‐ acquiring her belief about the age of the earth from studying relevant areas of science at school Wittgensteinian epistemology and epistemic relativism Wittgensteinian epistemology reconsidered Wittgenstein's argument for hinge propositions ‐ entailing epistemic incommensurability thesis distinctive problem, raised by epistemology of disagreement ‐ relevant to discussion of epistemic relativism
My notes
Similar books and articles
Wittgensteinian Hinge Epistemology and Deep Disagreement.Duncan Pritchard - 2018 - Topoi 40 (5):1117-1125.
Can Hinge Epistemology Close the Door on Epistemic Relativism?Oscar A. Piedrahita - 2021 - Synthese (1-2):1-27.
Why (Wittgensteinian) Contextualism Is Not Relativism.Michael Williams - 2007 - Episteme 4 (1):93-114.
Epistemic Relativism.Jonathan Matheson - 2012 - In Andrew Cullison (ed.), The Continuum Companion to Epistemology. New York: Continuum. pp. 161-179.
Scepticism, Relativism and a Naturalistic Particularism.Howard Sankey - 2015 - Social Epistemology 29 (4):395-412.
Wittgensteinian contextualism against epistemic relativism.Francois-Igor Pris - 2018 - APRIORI. Серия: Гуманитарные науки 5:1-37.
Towards a Politicized Anatomy of Fundamental Disagreement.Sophie Juliane Veigl - 2023 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 31 (3):450-466.
Relativism and Contextualism.Patrick Rysiew - 2010 - In Steven D. Hales (ed.), A Companion to Relativism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 286–305.
Quasi-fideism and epistemic relativism.Duncan Pritchard - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
19 (#792,484)
6 months
12 (#304,911)
2023-06-15
Downloads
19 (#792,484)
6 months
12 (#304,911)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Deep Disagreement (Part 1): Theories of Deep Disagreement.Chris Ranalli & Thirza Lagewaard - 2022 - Philosophy Compass 17 (12):e12886.
Deep Disagreement (Part 1): Theories of Deep Disagreement.Chris Ranalli & Thirza Lagewaard - 2022 - Philosophy Compass 17 (12):e12886.
Deep Disagreement (Part 2): Epistemology of Deep Disagreement.Chris Ranalli & Thirza Lagewaard - 2022 - Philosophy Compass 17 (12):e12887.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo