- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Relativism and Contextualism
In Steven D. Hales (ed.), A Companion to Relativism. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 286–305 (2011)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Abstract Introduction Classical Invariantism and the Ho ‐ Hum View Relativism and Contexualism: Clarifications and Distinctions Relativism and Contexualism: A Quick Look at Some Sample Views Flexibility and Disagreement, Charity and Error: A Common Motivating Idea, and a Common Objection Conclusion References.Author's Profile
relativism and contextualism relativistic thinking, and epistemic matters ‐ a long history epistemic relativism and contextualism classical invariantism and the ho‐hum view traditional and widely agreed upon “ho‐hum view” ‐ according to which knowledge is unGettiered true belief relativism and contexualism ‐ clarifications and distinctions confusion between (epistemic) contextualism and (epistemic) relativism barriers to achieving clarity ‐ about distinction between contextualism and relativism, terminological ones flexibility and disagreement, charity and error relativism, threatening disappearance of disagreement ‐ no less than does contextualism
My notes
Similar books and articles
Faultless disagreement, cognitive command, and epistemic peers.John K. Davis - 2015 - Synthese 192 (1):1-24.
Moral Contextualism and Moral Relativism.Berit Brogaard - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):385 - 409.
Contextualism, relativism and ordinary speakers' judgments.Martin Montminy - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (3):341 - 356.
Epistemic Contextualism, Epistemic Relativism and Disagreement.Robin McKenna - 2012 - Philosophical Writings.
Interest‐Relative Invariantism versus Contextualism.Jason Stanley - 2005 - In Knowledge and practical interests. New York: Oxford University Press.
Why (Wittgensteinian) Contextualism Is Not Relativism.Michael Williams - 2007 - Episteme 4 (1):93-114.
Is relativity a requirement for mind-dependence?Eyja M. Brynjarsdóttir - 2010 - In François Récanati, Isidora Stojanovic & Neftalí Villanueva (eds.), Context Dependence, Perspective and Relativity. Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 317–332.
Contextualism, relativism and ordinary speakers’ judgments.Martin Montminy - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (3):341-356.
From Epistemic Contextualism to Epistemic Expressivism.Matthew Chrisman - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (2):225-254.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
8 (#1,345,183)
6 months
7 (#491,177)
2023-06-15
Downloads
8 (#1,345,183)
6 months
7 (#491,177)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-dxklk uwo