Medical necessity, mental health, and justice

Clinical Ethics 18 (3):292-297 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the concept of medical necessity as it relates to mental health care rationing, arguing that the normal functioning model of medical necessity is insufficient because it fails to cohere with an important aim and function of mental health care, which is to provide support for individuals in abusive or otherwise difficult personal relationships.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interpreting Irremediability When a Mental Health Disorder is the Sole-qualifying Medical Condition for MAiD.Jeffrey Kirby - 2022 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 5 (4):83-88.
An Ethical Framework for Rationing Health Care.N. S. Jecker & R. A. Pearlman - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (1):79-96.
The significance of the concept of disease for justice in health care.Thomas Schramme - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (2):121-135.
Who Shall Live?: Health, Economics and Social Choice.Victor R. Fuchs - 2011 - New Jersey: World Scientific. Edited by Karen Eggleston.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-28

Downloads
71 (#228,543)

6 months
54 (#82,762)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Emma Prendergast
Utah Tech University

Citations of this work

The paradox of medical necessity.Samantha Godwin & Brian D. Earp - 2023 - Clinical Ethics 18 (3):281-284.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What a theory of mental health should be.Christopher Boorse - 1976 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 6 (1):61–84.

Add more references