Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 13 (6):397-400 (1979)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.3758/bf03336906 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
On the Generality of the Laws of Learning.Martin E. Seligman - 1970 - Psychological Review 77 (5):406-418.
The "Supersitition" Experiment: A Reexamination of its Implications for the Principles of Adaptive Behavior.J. E. Staddon & Virginia L. Simmelhag - 1971 - Psychological Review 78 (1):3-43.
Citations of this work BETA
Crows and Pigeons Differ Under Autoshaping.Linda J. Palm & Robert W. Powell - 1985 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (4):430-432.
Responding Under Variable-Interval, Variable-Time, and Extinction Schedules in Pigeons and Crows.Robert W. Powell & Linda J. Palm - 1982 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 19 (1):55-58.
Similar books and articles
Response-Independent Reinforcement in the Crow: Failure to Obtain Autoshaping or Positive Automaintenance.Robert W. Powell, William Kelly & David Santisteban - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (5):513-516.
Tool Use in Captive Crows.Robert W. Powell & William Kelly - 1977 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 10 (6):481-483.
Some Factors Controlling the Interaction Between Response-Dependent and Response-Independent Schedules of Reinforcement.Jack E. Sherman & Joseph H. Spitzner - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (6):625-628.
Changes in Response Strength with Changes in the Amount of Reinforcement.Robert H. Dufort & Gregory A. Kimble - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (3):185.
Role of the Instrumental Response in the Partial Reinforcement Effect.R. K. Banks - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):133.
The Effect of the Initial Reinforcement on Response Tendency.M. Ray Denny & Robert L. Martindale - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 52 (2):95.
Positive and Negative Partial-Reinforcement Extinction Effects Carried Through Continuous Reinforcement, Changed Motivation, and Changed Response.Robert R. Ross - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (5):492.
Resistance to Extinction and the Pattern of Reinforcement. I. Alternation of Reinforcement and the Conditioned Eyelid Response. [REVIEW]David A. Grant, Arthur J. Riopelle & Harold W. Hake - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (1):53.
Induction Effects During a Schedule of Response-Independent Reinforcement.J. T. Treadway & K. A. Lattal - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3 (4):298-300.
Performance in Different Segments of an Instrumental Response Chain as a Function of Reinforcement Schedule.Kenneth P. Goodrich - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (1):57.
Mean Amount of Reinforcement and Instrumental Response Strength.Stewart H. Hulse & Robert J. Firestone - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (5):417.
Selective Reinforcement of Response Speeds in Children.Robert B. Cairns & Stewart Proctor - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (1):168.
Response Latency as a Function of the Amount of Reinforcement.David Zeaman - 1949 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (4):466.
Response Strength and Self-Reinforcement.Albert R. Marston - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (6):537.
Predicting Instrumental Performance From the Independent Rate of the Contingent Response.David Premack - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (2):163.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-01-22
Total views
15 ( #698,152 of 2,507,888 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,888 )
2014-01-22
Total views
15 ( #698,152 of 2,507,888 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,888 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
