Philosophy and the Law of Torts

Cambridge University Press (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When accidents occur and people suffer injuries, who ought to bear the loss? Tort law offers a complex set of rules to answer this question, but up to now philosophers have offered little by way of analysis of these rules. In eight essays commissioned for this volume, leading legal theorists examine the philosophical foundations of tort law. Amongst the questions they address are the following: how are the notions at the core of tort practice to be understood? Is an explanation based on a conception of justice feasible? How are concerns of distributive and corrective justice related? What amounts to an adequate explanation of tort law? This collection will be of interest to professionals and advanced students working in philosophy of law, social theory, political theory, and law, as well as anyone seeking a better understanding of tort law.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
34 (#458,410)

6 months
4 (#1,005,098)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gerald Postema
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Citations of this work

Social Ontology.Brian Epstein - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Can tort law be moral?Avihay Dorfman - 2010 - Ratio Juris 23 (2):205-228.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references