A note on the difference between the lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction and the Einstein contraction

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (64):332-333 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The falsifiability of the lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction hypothesis.Adolf Grünbaum - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):48-50.
The “reality” of the lorentz contraction.Dennis Dieks - 1984 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 15 (2):330-342.
The falsifiability of the lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction hypothesis.Herbert Dingle - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):228-229.
Discussions: Thb falsifiability op the lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction hypothesis.Adolf Grünbaum - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):48-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
307 (#63,621)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A Touch of Malice.Joseph Agassi - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (1):107-119.
Einstein and special relativity. Some inconsistencies in his electrodynamics.E. G. Cullwick - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (2):167-176.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references