Non-pharmaceutical Interventions and Social Distancing as Intersubjective Care and Collective Protection

Asian Bioethics Review 14 (4):379-395 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper discusses non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) as a collective form of protection that, in terms of health justice, benefits groups at risk, allowing them to engage in social life and activities during health crises. More specifically, the paper asserts that NPIs that realize social distancing are justifiable insofar as they are constitutive of a type of social protection that allows everyone, especially social disadvantaged agents, to access the public health sphere and other fundamental social spheres, such as the family and civil society.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pharmaceutical enhancement and medical professionals.Gavin G. Enck - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (1):23-28.
Pharmaceutical medicine.D. M. Burley & Theodore Barker Binns (eds.) - 1985 - Baltimore, Md., U.S.A.: E. Arnold.
The Racial and Olfactory Origin of Social Distancing.Dunfu Zhang & Richard Atimniraye Nyelade - 2021 - Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 10 (1):55-70.
Breaking the Cycle: Solidarity with care-leaver mothers.Jenny Krutzinna - 2021 - Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies 7 (2):82-92.
Altruism and Self Interest in Medical Decision Making.Paul H. Rubin - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (3):401-409.
Five Un-Easy Pieces of Pharmaceutical Policy Reform.Marc A. Rodwin - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (3):581-589.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-15

Downloads
11 (#1,117,383)

6 months
6 (#510,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations