Principle monism and action descriptions: Situationism and its critics revisted

Modern Theology 7 (3):249-268 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can a single action have many different descriptions?Arthur B. Cody - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):164 – 180.
Why one basic principle?Jeffrey Brand-Ballard - 2007 - Utilitas 19 (2):220-242.
Situationism versus Situationism.Travis J. Rodgers & Brandon Warmke - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (1):9-26.
Davidson’s Identity Crisis.Daniel D. Hutto - 1998 - Dialectica 52 (1):45-61.
Is situationism all bad news?Luke Russell - 2009 - Utilitas 21 (4):443-463.
Anomalous monism and epiphenomenalism.Rex Welshon - 1999 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):103-120.
Epistemic situationism: An Extended Prolepsis.Mark Alfano - 2017 - In Mark Alfano & Abrol Fairweather (eds.), Epistemic Situationism. Oxford University Press.
The standard objection to anomalous monism.Neil Campbell - 1997 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (3):373-82.
Group-based reasons for action.Christopher Woodard - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (2):215-229.
"On Denoting" and the Principle of Acquaintance.Russell Wahl - 2007 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 27 (1):7-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
16 (#911,480)

6 months
3 (#984,114)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references