On Batterman's 'On the Explanatory Role of Mathematics in Empirical Science'

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1):211 - 217 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This discussion note of (Batterman [2010]) clarifies the modest aims of my 'mapping account' of applications of mathematics in science. Once these aims are clarified it becomes clear that Batterman's 'completely new approach' (Batterman [2010], p. 24) is not needed to make sense of his cases of idealized mathematical explanations. Instead, a positive proposal for the explanatory power of such cases can be reconciled with the mapping account.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-08

Downloads
92 (#186,128)

6 months
10 (#268,574)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Pincock
Ohio State University

Citations of this work

Explanatory Abstractions.Lina Jansson & Juha Saatsi - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (3):817–844.
Structure and applied mathematics.Travis McKenna - 2022 - Synthese 200 (5):1-31.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations