Patents

In Cane & Conaghan (ed.), The New Oxford Companion to Law (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The term “patent” is an abbreviation of “letters patent”, the open form of document historically issued by the Crown for the purpose of conferring a right or privilege or otherwise communicating the royal will. In contemporary law it denotes the species of intellectual property that is granted as an inducement for the creation and disclosure of novel, inventive and industrially applicable inventions. In the UK that property is conferred under the Patents Act 1977, or with similar effect the European Patent Convention (EPC), and comprises the exclusive right to use and sell a protected invention for up to 20 years. A protected invention may be any subject matter having technical character; a definition derived from the Act’s express exclusion from patentability of (among other things) discoveries, scientific theories, business methods and computer programs “as such”. Also excluded are surgical, therapeutic and diagnostic methods (for lack of industrial applicability), and inventions the commercial exploitation of which would be contrary to public policy or morality. In these and other respects the Patents Act follows the EPC, which it was the explicit purpose of that Act to implement. Patents are territorial, and are thus only valid and infringed in their country of issue. For a UK inventor to obtain protection outside the UK s/he must therefore obtain a patent from that country, either directly by applying under its laws, or if it is a party to the EPC or other intergovernmental agreement, indirectly by applying under that agreement. Inventors seeking protection for an invention in more than one country will often do so by means of the Patent Cooperation Treaty.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Patents and ethics: Is it possible to be balanced?Jacek Spławiński - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):71-74.
The Moral Justifiability of Patents.Sigrid Sterckx - 2006 - Ethical Perspectives 13 (2):249-265.
Surgical patents and patients — the ethical dilemmas.Tadeusz Tołłoczko - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):61-69.
Gene patents.Kerri Anne Brussen - 2011 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 16 (3):9.
Patents and Human Rights: A Heterodox Analysis.E. Richard Gold - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (1):185-198.
The immoral gene: Does it really exist? [REVIEW]Svenja Sethmann & Dr Franz-Joséf Zimmer - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):97-104.
Why are Software Patents so Elusive? A Platonic Approach.Odin Kroeger - 2011 - Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology 5 (1):57-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-10-06

Downloads
6 (#1,481,433)

6 months
6 (#700,231)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Justine Pila
Oxford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references