Above the heteronormative narrative: looking up the place of Disney’s villains

Semiotica 2023 (255):131-148 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article proposes a re-examination of the role and position of the so-called “Disney villains” within the narrative framework of animated films and popular culture as a whole. In the first part, the historical evolution in the representation of these villains will be explored according to the practice of “queer coding,” which involves attributing stereotypically queer traits to them without explicitly stating their gender and sexual identity. It will be observed how their non-conforming gender and sexuality, used to mark their moral deviance, challenge and defy dominant gender and narrative norms. It is precisely through their queer performance and camp aesthetic that “evil stepmothers,” “sissy-villains,” and “drag-queen-like” sea witches can emancipate themselves from their traditional roles as antagonists (narrative level) and as social outcasts (discursive level) to seize the spotlight through the screen (manifest surface). This study combines tools of Greimasian text analysis, including the canonical narrative schema and the generative trajectory of meaning, with Lotman’s theory and notion of “semiosphere,” to investigate the centrality and criticality of these “quillains” within the heteronormative narrative framework and the broader cultural context. To capture (or being captured by) the queer aspect of these characters and their stories, the invitation is to look at their visage not as a coded symbol of an underlying identity and truth, but as an image that exceeds any defined meaning thanks to its iconic power.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Let Slip the (Donald) Ducks of War!Tuomas W. Manninen - 2019-10-03 - In Richard B. Davis (ed.), Disney and Philosophy. Wiley. pp. 217–226.
Discipline and Pleasure: The pedagogical work of Disneyland.Susan L. Aronstein & Laurie A. Finke - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (6):610-624.
We're All Gonna Die.Jessica Miller - 2019-10-03 - In Richard B. Davis (ed.), Disney and Philosophy. Wiley. pp. 271–281.
Colonizing the Geography of the Imagination.Read Mercer Schuchardt - 2019-10-03 - In Richard B. Davis (ed.), Disney and Philosophy. Wiley. pp. 259–270.
How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Disney.Elizabeth Butterfield - 2019-10-03 - In Richard B. Davis (ed.), Disney and Philosophy. Wiley. pp. 245–258.
Liberty Square in the Shadow of Cinderella's Castle.Timothy Dale & Joseph Foy - 2019-10-03 - In Richard B. Davis (ed.), Disney and Philosophy. Wiley. pp. 283–291.
Beauty and the Belles: Discourses of Feminism and Femininity in Disneyland.Allison Craven - 2002 - European Journal of Women's Studies 9 (2):123-142.
From Snow White to Moana.Edwardo Pérez - 2019-10-03 - In Richard B. Davis (ed.), Disney and Philosophy. Wiley. pp. 71–80.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-12

Downloads
27 (#585,831)

6 months
27 (#110,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Doing Gender.Don H. Zimmerman & Candace West - 1987 - Gender and Society 1 (2):125-151.
Imitation and Gender Insubordination1.J. Butler - forthcoming - Cultural Theory and Popular Culture:255.
On the semiosphere.Juri Lotman & Wilma Clark - 2005 - Sign Systems Studies 33 (1):205-226.
Towards biosemiotics with Yuri Lotman.Kalevi Kull - 1999 - Semiotica 127 (1-4):115-132.

Add more references