A muddled defense of New Atheism: on Stenger's response

Science, Religion and Culture 1 (1):10-14 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Victor Stenger (this issue) has responded to my recent criticism of the so-called New Athe- ism movement (2013). Here I endeavor to counter Stenger’s note and highlight several of the ways in which it goes astray. To begin with, however, let me summarize the main points of my earlier paper.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement.Massimo Pigliucci - 2013 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 37 (1):142-153.
New atheism.Thomas Zenk - 2013 - In Stephen Bullivant & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press UK. pp. 245.
Atheism and epistemic justification.J. Angelo Corlett & Josh Cangelosi - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78 (1):91-106.
Reading Buber's I and Thou.Richard White - 2022 - International Philosophical Quarterly 62 (3):271-287.
Whither New Atheism?Graham Oppy - 2017 - In Christopher R. Cotter, Philip Andrew Quadrio & Jonathan Tuckett (eds.), New Atheism: Critical Perspectives and Contemporary Debates. Cham: Springer. pp. 15-31.
Why I Don't Believe in the New Atheism.Tom Flynn - 2010 - Free Inquiry 30 (3):7-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-04

Downloads
1,211 (#10,843)

6 months
60 (#90,662)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Massimo Pigliucci
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations