Natural number concepts: No derivation without formalization

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):666-667 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The conceptual building blocks suggested by developmental psychologists may yet play a role in how the human learner arrives at an understanding of natural number. The proposal of Rips et al. faces a challenge, yet to be met, faced by all developmental proposals: to describe the logical space in which learners ever acquire new concepts

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Finitude and Hume's Principle.Richard G. Heck Jr - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (6):589 - 617.
Normal derivations and sequent derivations.Mirjana Borisavljevi - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (6):521 - 548.
Limitations of formalization.Constantine Politis - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):356-360.
The formalization of interpretability.Albert Visser - 1991 - Studia Logica 50 (1):81 - 105.
Concepts.Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
35 (#456,481)

6 months
3 (#976,504)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Pietroski
Rutgers - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

Predicative Frege Arithmetic and ‘Everyday’ Mathematics.Richard Heck - 2014 - Philosophia Mathematica 22 (3):279-307.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The foundations of arithmetic.Gottlob Frege - 1884/1950 - Evanston, Ill.,: Northwestern University Press.
Frege's philosophy of mathematics.William Demopoulos (ed.) - 1995 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Add more references