The Leibniz-Stahl controversy (book review)

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (6):1238-1241 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Leibniz–Stahl Controversy. [REVIEW]Ohad Nachtomy - 2017 - The Leibniz Review 27:173-182.
Leibniz and the vis viva controversy.Idan Shimony - 2010 - In Marcelo Dascal (ed.), The Practice of Reason: Leibniz and His Controversies. Philadelphia / Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 51-73.
Leibniz and the Environment.Pauline Phemister - 2016 - New York: Routledge.
Perpetuum mobile: the Leibniz-Papin controversy.Gideon Freudenthal - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (3):573-637.
Leibniz and Malebranche on innate ideas.Nicholas Jolley - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (1):71-91.
Descartes and Leibniz.Pauline Phemister - 2011 - In Brandon Look (ed.), Continuum Companion to Leibniz. New York: Continuum. pp. 14-29.
Leibniz on Apperception, Consciousness and Reflection. [REVIEW]Pauline Phemister - 1992 - Leibniz Society of North America Newsletter 2:10-11.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-25

Downloads
41 (#387,380)

6 months
13 (#192,902)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pauline Phemister
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references