One Must Know It! A Personal Argument for Self-Regulation and Responsible Entrepreneurship

Philosophy of Management 6 (3):159-172 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

‘Isn’t it clear that a man must have the right to warn the majority, to argue with the majority, to fight with the majority if he believes he holds the truth? Before many can know something, one must know it!’ The words are Dr Stockman’s of An Enemy of the People1 and in a competitive market building upon a Smithian self-interest there might seem to be no room for people like him. Whatever the personal attitudes of the owners, managers and employees, they would feel forced to behave in business like all of their competitors. Such is the logic of the basic driving forces in Western societies. It is a logic that necessitates lean and mean production, the substitution of labour with capital, relocation of production to places with low labour costs — also known as social dumping — or to places with less stringent environmental demands and/or less costly safety regulations. The traditional way to prevent this happening has been to use state intervention and regulation to curb the worst cases. But today many of the traditional harnesses on an unbridled market economy have been removed, such as controls on capital movements, trade across borders or regulation of sectors like transport, telecommunication, energy, utilities and so on. With this in mind we may ask whether there exists an alternative to state intervention that would contain or change the direction of the logic from within the logic itself. In other words, is it possible for a single or a few entrepreneurs to change the logic in such a way that external regulation is avoided or reduced, while finding answers to the problems and concerns caused by that logic? Of course there is a risk that these answers may consist of just a kind of exploitative riding of the waves of concerns and offering strange, Potemkin-like answers to for instance the clamour for environmental responsibility. Responsible entrepreneurship is something else, though. It consists in understanding genuine concerns and using one’s special knowledge in a certain field, to experiment and develop constantly improving answers to these concerns, giving a concrete form to emerging values, and raising the expectations of all those having these concerns.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On ethical, social and environmental management systems.Antonio Argandoña - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 51 (1):41-52.
Social responsibility and the utilities.Alan Jones - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 34 (3-4):219 - 229.
Same-sex marriage and the regulation of language.Andrew Stivers & Andrew Valls - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (2):237-253.
Public entrepreneurship as social creativity.Nancy C. Roberts - 2006 - World Futures 62 (8):595 – 609.
Privacy Rights On The Internet.Norman E. Bowie & Karim Jamal - 2006 - Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (3):323-342.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-12

Downloads
27 (#585,141)

6 months
5 (#627,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references