AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to show that the Lorentz contraction of a rod is possible only if the rod’s world path is a real four-dimensional object. This result demonstrates that special relativity does require reality at the microscopic level to be a four-dimensional world represented by Minkowski spacetime.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Minkowski Space-Time: A Glorious Non-Entity.Harvey R. Brown & Oliver Pooley - 2004 - In Dennis Dieks (ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime. Elsevier. pp. 67--89.
Similar books and articles
On the Falsity of the Fitzgerald-Lorentz Contraction Hypothesis.Melbourne G. Evans - 1969 - Philosophy of Science 36 (4):354-362.
The Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction Hypothesis and the Combined Rod Contraction-Clock Retardation Hypothesis.Herman Erlichson - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (4):605-609.
The Origins of Length Contraction: I. The Fitzgerald-Lorentz Deformation Hypothesis.Harvey R. Brown - 2001 - American Journal of Physics 69:1044-1054.
A Note on the Difference Between the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction and the Einstein Contraction.Karl R. Popper - 1965 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (64):332-333.
The Concept of Contraction in Giordano Bruno’s Philosophy.Leo Catana - 2005 - Ashgate.
Three Approaches to Iterated Belief Contraction.Raghav Ramachandran, Abhaya C. Nayak & Mehmet A. Orgun - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (1):115-142.