A brief comment on ‘Mendeleyev Revisited’ by Marks & Marks

Foundations of Chemistry 23 (3):431-432 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10698-021-09411-w

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Mendeleyev revisited.E. G. Marks & J. A. Marks - 2021 - Foundations of Chemistry 23 (2):215-223.
Trade Marks as Property: A Philosophical Perspective.Dominic Scott, Alex Oliver & Miguel Ley-Pineda - 2008 - In Lionel Bently, Jennifer Davis & Jane C. Ginsburg (eds.), Trade Marks and Brands: An Interdisciplinary Critique. Cambridge University Press. pp. 285-305.
Newlands revisited: A display of the periodicity of the chemical elements for chemists. [REVIEW]E. G. Marks & J. A. Marks - 2010 - Foundations of Chemistry 12 (1):85-93.
Amoralist Rationalism? A Response to Joel Marks: Commentary on “Animal Abolitionism Meets Moral Abolitionism: Cutting the Gordian Knot of Applied Ethics” by Joel Marks.Zohar Lederman - 2014 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (2):115-116.
Tacitus Germania herausgegeben und erläutert. By Wilhelm Reeb. Pp. vi + 173; 2 plates (42 figures) and 1 map. Leipzig and Berlin: Teubner, 1930. Paper, 6 marks; cloth, 7.60 marks. [REVIEW]H. J. Rose - 1931 - The Classical Review 45 (6):244-244.
Clementis Ars Grammatica. Primum edidit Joannes Tolkiehn. (Philologi Supplement. Vol. XX., fasc. III.) Pp. lx + 113. Leipzig: Dieterich, 1928. 12 marks (bound, 14 marks). [REVIEW]A. Souter - 1929 - The Classical Review 43 (2):92-92.
Ioannes Sardianus: Commentarium in Aphthonium edidit H. Rabe. (Rhetores Graeci, Vol. XV.) Pp. xxxvi+306. Leipzig : B. G. Teubner, 1928. Sewn, 12 marks; bound, 14 marks. [REVIEW]J. D. Denniston - 1929 - The Classical Review 43 (06):240-.
Tacitus Germania herausgegeben und erläutert. By Wilhelm Reeb. Pp. vi + 173; 2 plates (42 figures) and 1 map. Leipzig and Berlin: Teubner, 1930. Paper, 6 marks; cloth, 7.60 marks. [REVIEW]H. J. Rose - 1931 - The Classical Review 45 (06):244-.
On the Potential Use of Cup-Marks.Fulvio Gosso - 2010 - Anthropology of Consciousness 21 (2):205-220.
Remarks on Impure Quotation.Mario Gomez-Torrente - 2005 - In Philippe De Brabanter (ed.), Hybrid Quotations. John Benjamins. pp. 129-151.
University of Kwazulu-Natal.Deane-Peter Baker - unknown
Babylonian solar theory on the Antikythera mechanism.Christián C. Carman & James Evans - 2019 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 73 (6):619-659.
Charisius Flavii Sosipatri Charisii Artis Grammaticae Libri V. Edidit Carolus Barwick. Pp. xxvi + 539. Leipzig: Teubner, 1925. 12 gold marks (14 gold marks, bound). [REVIEW]A. Souter - 1926 - The Classical Review 40 (02):84-85.
Exaggerated Emphasis.Peter McCue - 2014 - Journal of Scientific Exploration 28 (1).
A planet by any other name: An exercise in astro-metaphysics.Joel Marks - 2007 - Think 5 (14):103-106.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-03

Downloads
8 (#1,296,210)

6 months
2 (#1,229,212)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mendeleyev revisited.E. G. Marks & J. A. Marks - 2021 - Foundations of Chemistry 23 (2):215-223.

Add more references