The classic paradoxes of quantum theory

Foundations of Physics 14 (11):1131-1145 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper contains four new dialogues among Simplicio, Salviati, and Sagredo, on the fate of Schrödinger's cat, the existence of physical quantities, the paradigm of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, and why a watched kettle may boil, after all

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf01882494

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Interference and interaction in Schrödinger's wave mechanics.Hans-Jürgen Treder & Horst-Heino von Borzeszkowski - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (1):77-93.
Two paradoxes in quantum mechanics.H. P. Krips - 1969 - Philosophy of Science 36 (2):145-152.
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Correct?Gilles Brassard & André Allan Méthot - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (4):463-468.
Description of many separated physical entities without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanics.Dirk Aerts - 1982 - Foundations of Physics 12 (12):1131-1170.
Sharp and the refutation of the Einstein, podolsky, Rosen paradox.C. A. Hooker - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (2):224-233.
The physics of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox.B. H. Kellett - 1977 - Foundations of Physics 7 (9-10):735-757.
Quantum paradoxes, time, and derivation of thermodynamic law: Opportunities from change of energy paradigm.Helmut Tributsch - 2006 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (2):287 - 306.
Do we really understand quantum mechanics?Franck Laloë - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Einstein-podolsky-Rosen argument in quantum theory.Arthur Fine - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Reexamination of the arguments of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen.P. A. Moldauer - 1974 - Foundations of Physics 4 (2):195-205.
Paradigms & paradoxes.Robert Garland Colodny - 1972 - [Pittsburgh]: University of Pittsburgh Press. Edited by Arthur Fine.
Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, and Shannon.Asher Peres - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (3):511-514.
The Einstein-podolsky-Rosen argument and the bell inequalities.László E. Szabó - unknown
Photons uncertainty removes Einstein-podolsky-Rosen paradox.Daniele Tommasini - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
121 (#148,231)

6 months
8 (#352,539)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Existence of “free will” as a problem of physics.Asher Peres - 1986 - Foundations of Physics 16 (6):573-584.
Quantum statistical determinism.Eftichios Bitsakis - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (3):331-355.
Schrödinger's immortal cat.Asher Peres - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (1):57-76.
Speakable in quantum mechanics.Ronnie Hermens - 2013 - Synthese 190 (15):3265-3286.
Neumark's theorem and quantum inseparability.Asher Peres - 1990 - Foundations of Physics 20 (12):1441-1453.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The physicist's role in physical laws.Asher Peres - 1980 - Foundations of Physics 10 (7-8):631-634.

Add more references