Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, and Shannon

Foundations of Physics 35 (3):511-514 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox (1935) is reexamined in the light of Shannon’s information theory (1984). The EPR argument did not take into account that the observer’s information was localized, like any other physical object.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10701-004-1986-6

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Einstein-podolsky-Rosen paradox re-examined.David H. Sharp - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):225-233.
Logical refutation of the EPR argument.Oscar Chavoya-Aceves - 2013 - Physics Essays 26:21-23.
Separable hidden variables theory to explain Einstein-podolsky-Rosen paradox.S. V. Bhave - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):467-475.
Pair distributions and conditional independence: Some hints about the structure of strange quantum correlations.N. D. Mermin - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (3):359-373.
The Einstein-podolsky-Rosen paradox.Bas C. Fraassen - 1974 - Synthese 29 (1-4):291 - 309.
Photons uncertainty removes Einstein-podolsky-Rosen paradox.Daniele Tommasini - unknown
Sharp and the refutation of the Einstein, podolsky, Rosen paradox.C. A. Hooker - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (2):224-233.
On some frequent but controversial statements concerning the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations.O. Costa de Beauregard - 1985 - Foundations of Physics 15 (8):871-887.
Hidden variables and the argument of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen.Paul K. Feyerabend - 1981 - In Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method. Cambridge University Press. pp. 298--342.
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Reexamined.Gen-Ichiro Nagasaka - 1970 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970:437 - 445.
Les corrélations d'Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen et la causalité sans flèche passé-futur.Olivier Costa De Beauregard - 1983 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 88 (1):101 - 114.
Einstein-podolsky-Rosen argument.Author unknown - manuscript
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky & Nathan Rosen - 1935 - Physical Review (47):777-780.
The Einstein-podolsky-Rosen argument in quantum theory.Arthur Fine - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
197 (#100,823)

6 months
29 (#107,420)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Relational EPR.Matteo Smerlak & Carlo Rovelli - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (3):427-445.
Epistemic instrumentalism, exceeding our grasp.Arthur Fine - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (1):135-139.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Philoophical Consequences of Quantum Theory.James T. Cushing & Ernan McMullin (eds.) - 1989 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Schrödinger's immortal cat.Asher Peres - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (1):57-76.

Add more references