Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, and Shannon

Foundations of Physics 35 (3):511-514 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox (1935) is reexamined in the light of Shannon’s information theory (1984). The EPR argument did not take into account that the observer’s information was localized, like any other physical object.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,702

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Einstein-podolsky-Rosen paradox re-examined.David H. Sharp - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):225-233.
Separable hidden variables theory to explain Einstein-podolsky-Rosen paradox.S. V. Bhave - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):467-475.
The Einstein-podolsky-Rosen paradox.Bas C. Fraassen - 1974 - Synthese 29 (1-4):291 - 309.
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Reexamined.Gen-Ichiro Nagasaka - 1970 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970:437 - 445.
Einstein-podolsky-Rosen argument.Author unknown - manuscript
The Einstein-podolsky-Rosen argument in quantum theory.Arthur Fine - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.


Added to PP

165 (#84,013)

6 months
1 (#479,744)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?