Is constructivism floored? Reply to Stecker

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (1):82–86 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rightness and reasons: A reply to Stecker.Michael Krausz - 1997 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (4):415-418.
Goldman on interpreting art and literature+ reply to Stecker.Alan Goldman - 1991 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 49 (3):246-247.
Artistic Value and Sentimental Value: A Reply to Robert Stecker.Julian Dodd - 2013 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 71 (3):282-288.
Is the constructivist's dilemma flawed? Reply to Percival.Robert Stecker - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (1):81–82.
Response to Stecker.Alan Goldman - 1991 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 49 (3):246-247.
Robert Stecker, Interpretation and Construction: Art, Speech, and the Law.David Davies & Julie Van Camp - 2004 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (3):291-296.
Robert Stecker, Artworks: Definition, Meaning, Value.Roger Seamon - 1998 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56 (3):311-312.
Butter Knives and Screwdrivers: An Intentionalist Defense of Radical Constructivism.Peter Alward - 2014 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (3):247-260.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
35 (#121,482)

6 months
6 (#1,472,471)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Percival
Nottingham University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references