Philosophical Studies 156 (2):249-266 (2011)

Authors
Garrett Pendergraft
Pepperdine University
Abstract
Local miracle compatibilists claim that we are sometimes able to do otherwise than we actually do, even if causal determinism obtains. When we can do otherwise, it will often be true that if we were to do otherwise, then an actual law of nature would not have been a law of nature. Nevertheless, it is a compatibilist principle that we cannot do anything that would be or cause an event that violates the laws of nature. Carl Ginet challenges this nomological principle, arguing that it is not always capable of explaining our inability to do otherwise. In response to this challenge, I point out that this principle is part of a defense against the charge that local miracle compatibilists are committed to outlandish claims. Thus it is not surprising that the principle, by itself, will often fail to explain our inability to do otherwise. I then suggest that in many situations in which we are unable to do otherwise, this can be explained by the compatibilist’s analysis of ability, or his criteria for the truth of ability claims. Thus, the failure of his nomological principle to explain the falsity of certain ability claims is no strike against local miracle compatibilism
Keywords Free will  Determinism  Compatibilism  Local miracle compatibilism  Ability
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2011
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-010-9594-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

An Essay on Free Will.Peter Van Inwagen - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
Philosophical Papers Vol. II.David K. Lewis (ed.) - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
On Action.Carl Ginet - 1990 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Philosophical Papers, Volume II.David Lewis - 1986 - Oxford University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Free Will.Timothy O'Connor & Christopher Evan Franklin - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Compatibilism.Michael McKenna - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Arguments for Incompatibilism.Kadri Vihvelin - 2003/2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Contrariety of Compatibilist Positions.Saul Smilansky - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:293-309.
A Defense of Local Miracle Compatibilism.Peter A. Graham - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (1):65 - 82.
Local Miracle Compatibilism.Helen Beebee - 2003 - Noûs 37 (2):258-277.
Ability and Cognition: A Defense of Compatibilism.Tomis Kapitan - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 63 (August):231-43.
Dispositional Abilities.Ann Whittle - 2010 - Philosophers' Imprint 10.
A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
Defending Lewis’s Local Miracle Compatibilism.Shane Oakley - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 130 (2):337-349.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-07-19

Total views
271 ( #39,190 of 2,499,677 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #15,246 of 2,499,677 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes