Sceptics, believers, and historical mistakes

Synthese 67 (1):131 - 146 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Inattention to the historical antecedents of current philosophical views may impoverish our arguments in defense of those views. A case in point, examined here, concerns the difference that can be made for current strategies designed to defend religious belief by carefully reconsidering the position of historical sceptics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
67 (#242,046)

6 months
2 (#1,188,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Penelhum
Last affiliation: University of Calgary

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thought and knowledge: essays.Norman Malcolm - 1977 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed.M. F. Burnyeat - 1982 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 13:19-50.
The Concept of Prayer.Antony Flew & D. Z. Phillips - 1967 - Philosophical Quarterly 17 (66):91.

View all 14 references / Add more references